Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SteveInTampa, post: 3399237, member: 27107&quot;]A quote on a different forum,</p><p><br /></p><p>“I think that both companies are prone to making the occasional mistake. The important thing is that both stand behind their grades with a guarantee. That&#039;s never changed and isn&#039;t going to change in the near future.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyone who has such an obvious bias for one company over the other that it leads them to dig up examples of the other company&#039;s mistakes, in order to &quot;prove&quot; that the other company is either incapable or unethical, either has a severe axe to grind or else has something to gain by doing so. I&#039;ve always cautioned this sort of exercise, even by those who prefer my company&#039;s grading, because there are plenty of examples that can be presented as &quot;evidence&quot; in either direction. Over the years, I&#039;ve found that most differences in grades by the two companies are legitimate differences of opinion by only a point or two. Examples of extreme overgrading or undergrading by either company are extremely rare, and even then in most cases they can be explained by human error.” -&nbsp; Jason W Bradford</p><p><br /></p><p>Why a collector would throw more money at a PCGS graded note to have it graded again doesn’t make sense to me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in