Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Plunging into the murky depths of Northumbrian coinage
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="WuntBeDruv, post: 4962115, member: 115520"]After some encouragement and inspiration by [USER=73099]@Nap[/USER] 's brilliant collection of Northumbrian stycas (as well as the upcoming sale of Tony Abramson's 'dark age' collection at Spink in December) I recently made my first purchase of a silver Northumbrian <i>sceatta</i>. </p><p><br /></p><p>In essence, these coins reflect a continuation of the un-attributable <i>sceatta</i> coinages of both continental and British manufacture which circulated extensively here from c. AD 680 up to the earlier decades of the 8th century. However, Northumbrian examples are more developed than these earlier pieces in the respect that they name both the king and moneyer clearly upon them. Names (often in runic form) do appear on the earlier <i>sceattas</i>, but it is uncertain whether these are of rulers, moneyers or even places. </p><p><br /></p><p>While places like Mercia and Wessex were transitioning to use of the larger, thinner silver pennies, Northumbria very much adheres to tradition - preferring to continue issuing these small but quite solid coins. </p><p><br /></p><p>First issued under King Eadberht (737-758) these Northumbrian <i>sceattas </i>initially are of fairly good (though not sterling fine) silver - but become more debased from the reigns of Æthelred I onwards. By the start of the reign of King Eanred in c. AD 810, the silver content appears to be in some cases as low as 30% - and soon even this would disappear totally. It is in Eanred's reign that the silver <i>sceatta </i>ceases to exist in the true sense, becoming a copper-alloy coin known now as the <i>styca</i>. </p><p><br /></p><p>This coin (pic. 1) is a non-pictorial issue of reasonably good silver, probably struck for King Æthelred I's second reign of c. AD 789-796 by the moneyer CEOLBALD; </p><p><br /></p><p>Obverse: AEDILRED, cross surmounting quadripartite square motif</p><p>Reverse: +CEOLBALD, circular boss within pelleted ring</p><p><br /></p><p>Spink 856, Pirie 1.3a</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1192880[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>This is a rare variant on the most commonly encountered type, which has a cross-in-pelleted ring at the centre of the obverse. I have found one other die-pair </p><p>duplicate on a Yorkshire dealer's website (see below). </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1192881[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Perhaps this interesting symbol is intended to be reminiscent of a large churchyard cross, such as those Northumbrian examples encountered at Easby, Ruthwell and Bewcastle. Who knows!</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1192882[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="WuntBeDruv, post: 4962115, member: 115520"]After some encouragement and inspiration by [USER=73099]@Nap[/USER] 's brilliant collection of Northumbrian stycas (as well as the upcoming sale of Tony Abramson's 'dark age' collection at Spink in December) I recently made my first purchase of a silver Northumbrian [I]sceatta[/I]. In essence, these coins reflect a continuation of the un-attributable [I]sceatta[/I] coinages of both continental and British manufacture which circulated extensively here from c. AD 680 up to the earlier decades of the 8th century. However, Northumbrian examples are more developed than these earlier pieces in the respect that they name both the king and moneyer clearly upon them. Names (often in runic form) do appear on the earlier [I]sceattas[/I], but it is uncertain whether these are of rulers, moneyers or even places. While places like Mercia and Wessex were transitioning to use of the larger, thinner silver pennies, Northumbria very much adheres to tradition - preferring to continue issuing these small but quite solid coins. First issued under King Eadberht (737-758) these Northumbrian [I]sceattas [/I]initially are of fairly good (though not sterling fine) silver - but become more debased from the reigns of Æthelred I onwards. By the start of the reign of King Eanred in c. AD 810, the silver content appears to be in some cases as low as 30% - and soon even this would disappear totally. It is in Eanred's reign that the silver [I]sceatta [/I]ceases to exist in the true sense, becoming a copper-alloy coin known now as the [I]styca[/I]. This coin (pic. 1) is a non-pictorial issue of reasonably good silver, probably struck for King Æthelred I's second reign of c. AD 789-796 by the moneyer CEOLBALD; Obverse: AEDILRED, cross surmounting quadripartite square motif Reverse: +CEOLBALD, circular boss within pelleted ring Spink 856, Pirie 1.3a [ATTACH=full]1192880[/ATTACH] This is a rare variant on the most commonly encountered type, which has a cross-in-pelleted ring at the centre of the obverse. I have found one other die-pair duplicate on a Yorkshire dealer's website (see below). [ATTACH=full]1192881[/ATTACH] Perhaps this interesting symbol is intended to be reminiscent of a large churchyard cross, such as those Northumbrian examples encountered at Easby, Ruthwell and Bewcastle. Who knows! [ATTACH=full]1192882[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Plunging into the murky depths of Northumbrian coinage
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...