Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Please ID this ancient
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1721247, member: 19463"]This might be a disagreement. Rainbow toning is generally a sign of natural processes in the last century or chemical enhancements in the last year or so. That makes it fine for a Morgan dollar and not natural for a 1500 year old coin. I prefer gray but that is again a matter of preference. Compare this Hormazd IV (common), clear mint and date (WYH 12), flat spots on reverse (can't win them all), smooth surfaces and $23 a year and a half ago. Note it also shows textbook "edge plane angle changes". We still need to ID the OP coin and that would suggest a better photo. How much do you discount the value of a coin that is not clearly identifiable? Khusro II is a special case when it comes to price. Just about anything is worth more so we can be picky about grade for K2. Some mints are not as well struck or well styled as others. Do we expect to pay less for a mint with distinctively poor style or do we say that it is typical for that mint and should not be held against a coin? This is all part of the philosophy of collecting. Ugly is in the eye of the collector.</p><p>[ATTACH]266842.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 1721247, member: 19463"]This might be a disagreement. Rainbow toning is generally a sign of natural processes in the last century or chemical enhancements in the last year or so. That makes it fine for a Morgan dollar and not natural for a 1500 year old coin. I prefer gray but that is again a matter of preference. Compare this Hormazd IV (common), clear mint and date (WYH 12), flat spots on reverse (can't win them all), smooth surfaces and $23 a year and a half ago. Note it also shows textbook "edge plane angle changes". We still need to ID the OP coin and that would suggest a better photo. How much do you discount the value of a coin that is not clearly identifiable? Khusro II is a special case when it comes to price. Just about anything is worth more so we can be picky about grade for K2. Some mints are not as well struck or well styled as others. Do we expect to pay less for a mint with distinctively poor style or do we say that it is typical for that mint and should not be held against a coin? This is all part of the philosophy of collecting. Ugly is in the eye of the collector. [ATTACH]266842.vB[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Please ID this ancient
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...