Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Please help attribute a Constantius II solidus
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="scarborough, post: 4284545, member: 93146"]I’m writing to ask for assistance attributing a solidus I just purchased in the latest Naville auction</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1090319[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Constantius II AD 337 – 361, solidus, Thessalonica, ca AD 340 – 350 (21mm 4.63g)</p><p>CONSTANTIVS AVGVSTVS pearl diademed draped and cuirassed bust right</p><p>VICTORIAE DD NN AVGG Two ugly Victories, facing one another, holding between them a wreath inscribed VOT XX MVLT XXX. In exergue TES</p><p><br /></p><p>The dealer attributed it to C280, Depeyrot 5/1, RIC 63.</p><p><br /></p><p>Of the three references I have RIC so I looked it up … </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1090320[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Cs36 means CONSTANTIVS – AVGVSTVS, and</p><p>D3 means pearl diademed bust right, draped and cuirassed.</p><p><br /></p><p>So RIC 63 looks like a good fit.</p><p><br /></p><p>But on the next page is RIC 71, with the same obverse and reverse description …</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1090321[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>So what is the correct attribution, is it RIC 63 or RIC 71?</p><p><br /></p><p>Many thanks for your consideration and help.</p><p><br /></p><p>D[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="scarborough, post: 4284545, member: 93146"]I’m writing to ask for assistance attributing a solidus I just purchased in the latest Naville auction [ATTACH=full]1090319[/ATTACH] Constantius II AD 337 – 361, solidus, Thessalonica, ca AD 340 – 350 (21mm 4.63g) CONSTANTIVS AVGVSTVS pearl diademed draped and cuirassed bust right VICTORIAE DD NN AVGG Two ugly Victories, facing one another, holding between them a wreath inscribed VOT XX MVLT XXX. In exergue TES The dealer attributed it to C280, Depeyrot 5/1, RIC 63. Of the three references I have RIC so I looked it up … [ATTACH=full]1090320[/ATTACH] Cs36 means CONSTANTIVS – AVGVSTVS, and D3 means pearl diademed bust right, draped and cuirassed. So RIC 63 looks like a good fit. But on the next page is RIC 71, with the same obverse and reverse description … [ATTACH=full]1090321[/ATTACH] So what is the correct attribution, is it RIC 63 or RIC 71? Many thanks for your consideration and help. D[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Please help attribute a Constantius II solidus
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...