Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;raider34, post: 658135, member: 16402&quot;]I agree, I used the 87 S just as an example of what an &quot;extremely well struck&quot; seated dime would look like. Here&#039;s a pic of a 1887 P that is well struck, but I still wouldn&#039;t call extremely well struck.</p><p><br /></p><p>Coinman I&#039;m not arguing that the coin doesn&#039;t have enough detail to warrant a MS64 grade, those two coins you posted are 64s but they are definitely weak strikes. I believe the lack of detail on the OPs coin is from wear, due to the loss of luster on the points, and not from a weak strike, which is why I gave it a AU grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now am I 100% sure this coin is AU, not even close, but I am 100% sure this coin is not a &quot;extremely well struck&quot; seated liberty dime.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in