Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;phankins11, post: 2312917, member: 70703&quot;]Fantastic find and purchase price....if its genine.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m inclined to think the mint mark is correct. I have two of these myself and the depression looks the same, which is what you want.</p><p><br /></p><p>The only thing that bothers me about the mint mark is that in the original close up, the D look to be re punched (see my pic below)...I don&#039;t know of an RPM variety for the 1932 D. CPG doesn&#039;t list one. CONECA&#039;s first listing of an RPM for the Washington Quarter series starts in 1934 and Wexler only lists 1 RPM for 1932 S but no D RPM until 1935.</p><p><br /></p><p>This could be really cool, in that you found an RPM for a 1932 D Washington quarter, or really bad in that, at the very least, the mint mark has taken a hit which will always cause questions in the mind of your future buyer, and at worse the mint mark has been added, or augmented.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you send it in I want to know what comes back. I wonder if sending it to Wexler for attribution would be a good idea.</p><p><br /></p><p>FWIW my guess to the grade is AU53 tops, but because of being the key to the series, if it is genuine, you might get AU55ish.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]466418[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>also looping in some known Washington Quarter experts...</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=71828]@NorCalJack[/USER] [USER=76831]@John Feigenbaum[/USER] (if I&#039;ve forgotten any one I appologize)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in