Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Please confirm my attribution.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="manymore, post: 802451, member: 17118"]Because of the differences already pointed out, we now know for a fact that the coin is <u>not</u> 16.399, 16.400 or 16.401.</p><p><br /></p><p>Hartill's book only introduces a <u>very few</u> representative varieties of this coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have a reprint of a Chinese coin catalog that was written by a famous Japanese collector in the late 1800's. While Hartill provides rubbings of <b>6</b> <i>chong ning tong bao</i> coins, this old Chinese catalog has rubbings for <b>81</b> different varieties.</p><p><br /></p><p>For the <i>chong ning <u>zhong</u> bao</i> coin, Hartill has rubbings for <b>13</b> varieties while the Chinese catalog documents <b>142</b>.</p><p><br /></p><p>There are so many varieties of the 10 cash <i>chong ning</i> coins that I am not aware of any catalog in any language that comes close to documenting all of them.</p><p><br /></p><p>I actually tried to identify the variety of ls8driver's coin in the Chinese catalog but finally gave up in frustration because the differences among the varieties is so subtle.</p><p><br /></p><p>It's a beautiful coin with an <a href="http://primaltrek.com/chinesecoins.html#chong_ning" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://primaltrek.com/chinesecoins.html#chong_ning" rel="nofollow">interesting history</a> and odds are that it is one of the more common varieties.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, there is always the possibility that it is a variety even rarer than Hartill's "large character" specimen.</p><p><br /></p><p>Gary[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="manymore, post: 802451, member: 17118"]Because of the differences already pointed out, we now know for a fact that the coin is [U]not[/U] 16.399, 16.400 or 16.401. Hartill's book only introduces a [U]very few[/U] representative varieties of this coin. I have a reprint of a Chinese coin catalog that was written by a famous Japanese collector in the late 1800's. While Hartill provides rubbings of [B]6[/B] [I]chong ning tong bao[/I] coins, this old Chinese catalog has rubbings for [B]81[/B] different varieties. For the [I]chong ning [U]zhong[/U] bao[/I] coin, Hartill has rubbings for [B]13[/B] varieties while the Chinese catalog documents [B]142[/B]. There are so many varieties of the 10 cash [I]chong ning[/I] coins that I am not aware of any catalog in any language that comes close to documenting all of them. I actually tried to identify the variety of ls8driver's coin in the Chinese catalog but finally gave up in frustration because the differences among the varieties is so subtle. It's a beautiful coin with an [URL="http://primaltrek.com/chinesecoins.html#chong_ning"]interesting history[/URL] and odds are that it is one of the more common varieties. On the other hand, there is always the possibility that it is a variety even rarer than Hartill's "large character" specimen. Gary[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Please confirm my attribution.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...