Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Lehigh96, post: 974759, member: 15309&quot;]Now contrast the coin above with a 1974 with contact marks.&nbsp; Your error example was also a 1974 IIRC.&nbsp; The striking issues of the Jefferson Nickel had been remedied by 1974 and your example has about the best obverse strike characteristics I have ever seen.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i117.photobucket.com/albums/o59/ACPitBoss/Jefferson%20Nickels%20Full%20Steps/JeffersonNickel1974BUObverse.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Notice how defined the contact marks are on the jaw unlike the 1952.&nbsp; I will admit that the TPG&#039;s routinely excuse contact marks that are found in this area as planchet flaws but that does not mean we throw the baby out with the bath water.&nbsp; Planchet flaws are real and should be excused during grading IMO.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in