Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Jaelus, post: 2396904, member: 46237&quot;]Update:</p><p><br /></p><p>I showed the above 1915KB Korona and also a 1912 Corona that had come back in MS slabs to several world dealers and all of them unanimously agreed that they were PL. My primary LCS suggested I resubmit them, and so on my next submission I sent them both back to NGC in the slabs specifically marked for PL designation review.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here are the coins. Tough to capture the surfaces faithfully, but they are full watery mirrors with frosty devices.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Austria 1912 Corona</b></p><p><b>NGC MS64</b></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]493139[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]493140[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]493142[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><b>Hungary 1915KB Korona</b></p><p><b>NGC MS63</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]493136[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]493138[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]493144[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Here are the coins after PL designation review:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]493143[/ATTACH] </p><p>[ATTACH=full]493145[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>So both got the PL upon designation review, but it&#039;s puzzling that I had to resubmit to get it. While these are common dates, PL examples are scarce and command a premium, so it&#039;s surprising that the designation would be overlooked. If these were US coins of the same dates, they would have 100% gotten the designation on the first submission. Still, it&#039;s nice to see that NGC corrects their mistakes like this. The customer service was great, and the designation review is a relatively inexpensive service. I&#039;ve got a couple more PL world coins without designations that I will likely send in with my next submission as well.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in