Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Picture comparisons- Experimenting.... Toned Token....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="philologus_1, post: 26214454, member: 92212"]First, I agree with [USER=87624]@Jersey magic man[/USER]</p><p><br /></p><p>But, I have a question that only [USER=115232]@SensibleSal66[/USER] knows the answer to:</p><p><br /></p><p>Since the two colors (emphasized below) are very different, <u>which color is closest to the coin's color when looking at it in-person, in-hand, face-to-face</u>?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1674175[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I realize of course that the overall color of any coin will vary depending on the light under which it is being viewed, but these two colors are <b><i>quite</i></b> different. </p><p><br /></p><p>To me the "better" image in any image comparison of a specific coin specimen, should be: The image that all-around most closely matches (in crispness of detail, and in coloration) the actual coin as viewed in-person.</p><p><br /></p><p>Two examples:</p><p>(1) If a coin's legend is moderately crisp when viewed in-person, then the better image would be the one in which the legend appears most moderately crisp. (Keep in mind that a blurry and/or out-of-focus image distorts crispness of detail to the point that it makes deciding which is a 'better' image challenging.)</p><p>(2) If the fields on a coin are coppery-gold when viewed in-person, then the fields that appear in the image should also be coppery-gold. </p><p><br /></p><p>To me, the "better" image in any comparison is not the image which looks the most pretty, or the most colorful, or etc. Instead, the "better" image in any comparison is the image which makes the coin appear as close as possible to 100% of what the coin REALLY looks like in-person with the naked eye. Flaws included.</p><p><br /></p><p>It's all too easy to take a photograph of a coin and enhance the image (<i>via</i> photo editing) into an image that makes the coin look MUCH better than it is. To me, such editing causes a <i>lesser</i> image, not a <i>better</i> one.</p><p><br /></p><p>To hopefully help clarify my point: If I were to buy a coin that used the #1 image in the sales listing, and I received a coin in the mail that looked like the #2 image, I would <u>not</u> return it -- but I <i>would</i> be disappointed -- and I also would wish that the seller's listing had included . . . (wait for it) . . . a "better" image.</p><p>.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="philologus_1, post: 26214454, member: 92212"]First, I agree with [USER=87624]@Jersey magic man[/USER] But, I have a question that only [USER=115232]@SensibleSal66[/USER] knows the answer to: Since the two colors (emphasized below) are very different, [U]which color is closest to the coin's color when looking at it in-person, in-hand, face-to-face[/U]? [ATTACH=full]1674175[/ATTACH] I realize of course that the overall color of any coin will vary depending on the light under which it is being viewed, but these two colors are [B][I]quite[/I][/B] different. To me the "better" image in any image comparison of a specific coin specimen, should be: The image that all-around most closely matches (in crispness of detail, and in coloration) the actual coin as viewed in-person. Two examples: (1) If a coin's legend is moderately crisp when viewed in-person, then the better image would be the one in which the legend appears most moderately crisp. (Keep in mind that a blurry and/or out-of-focus image distorts crispness of detail to the point that it makes deciding which is a 'better' image challenging.) (2) If the fields on a coin are coppery-gold when viewed in-person, then the fields that appear in the image should also be coppery-gold. To me, the "better" image in any comparison is not the image which looks the most pretty, or the most colorful, or etc. Instead, the "better" image in any comparison is the image which makes the coin appear as close as possible to 100% of what the coin REALLY looks like in-person with the naked eye. Flaws included. It's all too easy to take a photograph of a coin and enhance the image ([I]via[/I] photo editing) into an image that makes the coin look MUCH better than it is. To me, such editing causes a [I]lesser[/I] image, not a [I]better[/I] one. To hopefully help clarify my point: If I were to buy a coin that used the #1 image in the sales listing, and I received a coin in the mail that looked like the #2 image, I would [U]not[/U] return it -- but I [I]would[/I] be disappointed -- and I also would wish that the seller's listing had included . . . (wait for it) . . . a "better" image. .[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Picture comparisons- Experimenting.... Toned Token....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...