Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Severus Alexander, post: 8200630, member: 84744&quot;]Thanks, [USER=74712]@FitzNigel[/USER], for all that additional info!&nbsp; Yes, I imagined Travaini might be a bit difficult to navigate without Italian, no worries.&nbsp; Maybe I&#039;ll write to her directly. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />&nbsp; It looks to me like 32a is an overstrike, where the undertype obverse looks a bit like mine. There&#039;s some similarity with 34b as well.&nbsp; I&#039;d love to see the plate of MEC 78 - though I should probably buy that volume, I&#039;ve certainly been tempted before!</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m also interested in the taris, since I have an imitation of a Sicily mint Fatimid quarter dinar (imitating al-&#039;Aziz, late 10th century), probably produced in Italy:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1437047[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;d love to see your similar follaro, [USER=110504]@+VGO.DVCKS[/USER], if you have a photo now.&nbsp; I agree the low weight is significant. (And also about the chaos!&nbsp; There are few specimens of many types.)&nbsp; My understanding is the lower weight coins tend to put them earlier, perhaps even leaking into Gisulfo&#039;s reign at Salerno.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in