Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Roman Collector, post: 7632786, member: 75937&quot;]Moreover, the flans were likely cast before striking. Jere M. Wickens, in his essay, &quot;<a href="http://www2.lawrence.edu/dept/art/BUERGER/ESSAYS/PRODUCTION.HTML" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www2.lawrence.edu/dept/art/BUERGER/ESSAYS/PRODUCTION.HTML" rel="nofollow">The Production of Ancient Coins</a>,&quot; written for <a href="http://www2.lawrence.edu/dept/art/BUERGER/INTRO/CONTENTS.HTML" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www2.lawrence.edu/dept/art/BUERGER/INTRO/CONTENTS.HTML" rel="nofollow"><i>Bearers of Meaning: The Otillia Buerger Collection of Ancient and Byzantine Coins at Lawrence University</i></a>, notes that flans &quot;were cast en chapelet, that is, using open or closed moulds in which a number of mould hollows were connected by channels.&quot; This resulted in a &quot;runner&quot; or sprue between the cast flans, which would be removed before striking. Sometimes, the process of breaking off the sprue removed a chunk from the flan’s edge, leaving what is known as a &quot;flan chip.&quot; Evidence of casting sprue removal is seen on this denarius at the 9:00 position on the obverse. This sort of thing contributes to variance in weight. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1312989[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in