Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GSDykes, post: 2201911, member: 73321&quot;]I like the coins, not the aforementioned photographs. They (your coin photos) were made/adjusted using Photoshop CC 2015, on a Windows platform: the one&#039;s posted are low resolution. That is my opinion. You are not asked to like or dislike my meager efforts (I have not posted any of my choice type photos, yet), that is your call. As to damage, <span style="color: #ff4dff">tarnish</span> can affect nearly all coin metals. It is actually a chemical reaction embedded within the surface molecules of the coin&#039;s metal. This is caused by: atmosphere, holders, handling, improper cleanings, et cetera. Since it is or becomes embedded within the metal itself, it is true damage, an alteration of the original surface. To remove it, entails removal of some of the coin&#039;s metallic surface. Numismatics often like the damages&#039; appearance, as the reactions can cause colorful colors to dazzle. These colors are the result of &quot;damage&quot; (sulphides, oxides, et al). Some numismatics do not like damaged coins. It is all relative to the individual&#039;s taste. Some of the coins displayed in the OP are damaged, and just plain dirty. Careful extraction of <span style="color: #ff00ff">debris</span> before the photographic portraits would have resulted in a proper archival keepsake (in my opinion). Most photographers are not qualified to remove such crud, that is a separate operation. Some folks like to keep the dirt, debris, grease, oils and other eyesores. Again it is all relative. If you like your photos, fine. I just think the coins show damage and debris. Why is that offensive to you? Here is a tiny sample of what I am talking about, as you seem to think this is some sort of a &quot;debate&quot;.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]429132[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in