Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Photo Pros - Which Camera Lens Do You Use?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="benveniste, post: 2662267, member: 25547"]Disclaimer: I am by no means a photo pro, but I do play with a lot of macro gear. All of the coins I've posted here are my own photographs.</p><p><br /></p><p>Let's start with the objective stuff. The D3300 you're considering has a sensor size of 23.5mm by 15.6mm. Canon uses a slightly smaller sensor in its consumer-level dSLR's. The smallest U.S. coin ever minted is 13mm in diameter. That means that using an off-the-shelf macro lens like the 85mm f/3.5 VR Micro-Nikkor, you can fill the frame with all but the smallest U.S. coins and come close on the rest. But if you wish to get close-ups on doubled lettering and other small features, then a bellows is just one of several possible approaches. Note that a PB-6 imposes a certain minimum amount of extension -- you may find that a few objects that are too big to use with a PB-6 but too small to fill the frame using a non-macro "kit" lens.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now back to opinions. One of the challenges when using a bellows to shoot a coin is trying to figure out how to position all of the bits and still eliminate (or at least minimize) vibration. Using an enlarger lens on a bellows takes a lot more time for me than, say, using a macro lens and some extension tubes on a copystand. At least to start, I suggest you keep the "taking" part simple and focus on lighting and support kit. Even if you like to MacGyver things (and who doesn't) you'll have plenty to improvise with diffusers, lighting brackets and the like.</p><p><br /></p><p>As for budget, if you live in the United States, Nikon offers a "Macro and Portrait Two Lens Kit" consisting of an 85mm f/3.5 VR Micro-Nikkor and a 35mm f/1.8 DX. Total cost is $500. Unlike an enlarger lens based setup, for that money you not only get a solid macro solution but you also get two useful lenses for general purpose photography.</p><p><br /></p><p>Many people sneer at autofocus for macro work. Still, about half the "full coin" shots I take are with Live View autofocus. I find that at least on my D800, it's more than sufficient for modern low relief coins, and my eyes aren't getting any younger :-(.</p><p><br /></p><p>So in conclusion, I'm proposing that you spend some extra money as compared to a manual focus solution. For that money, you'll gain a lot of convenience plus options for general purpose photography. Good luck however you choose![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="benveniste, post: 2662267, member: 25547"]Disclaimer: I am by no means a photo pro, but I do play with a lot of macro gear. All of the coins I've posted here are my own photographs. Let's start with the objective stuff. The D3300 you're considering has a sensor size of 23.5mm by 15.6mm. Canon uses a slightly smaller sensor in its consumer-level dSLR's. The smallest U.S. coin ever minted is 13mm in diameter. That means that using an off-the-shelf macro lens like the 85mm f/3.5 VR Micro-Nikkor, you can fill the frame with all but the smallest U.S. coins and come close on the rest. But if you wish to get close-ups on doubled lettering and other small features, then a bellows is just one of several possible approaches. Note that a PB-6 imposes a certain minimum amount of extension -- you may find that a few objects that are too big to use with a PB-6 but too small to fill the frame using a non-macro "kit" lens. Now back to opinions. One of the challenges when using a bellows to shoot a coin is trying to figure out how to position all of the bits and still eliminate (or at least minimize) vibration. Using an enlarger lens on a bellows takes a lot more time for me than, say, using a macro lens and some extension tubes on a copystand. At least to start, I suggest you keep the "taking" part simple and focus on lighting and support kit. Even if you like to MacGyver things (and who doesn't) you'll have plenty to improvise with diffusers, lighting brackets and the like. As for budget, if you live in the United States, Nikon offers a "Macro and Portrait Two Lens Kit" consisting of an 85mm f/3.5 VR Micro-Nikkor and a 35mm f/1.8 DX. Total cost is $500. Unlike an enlarger lens based setup, for that money you not only get a solid macro solution but you also get two useful lenses for general purpose photography. Many people sneer at autofocus for macro work. Still, about half the "full coin" shots I take are with Live View autofocus. I find that at least on my D800, it's more than sufficient for modern low relief coins, and my eyes aren't getting any younger :-(. So in conclusion, I'm proposing that you spend some extra money as compared to a manual focus solution. For that money, you'll gain a lot of convenience plus options for general purpose photography. Good luck however you choose![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Photo Pros - Which Camera Lens Do You Use?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...