Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;rlm&#039;s cents, post: 603655, member: 7957&quot;]First off, by your definition, I believe they are all juiced.&nbsp; &quot;...intentionally altered (juiced) the colors of the image in an attempt to increase financial gain.&quot;&nbsp; I am positive that each picture was purposely taken to bring out the colors.&nbsp; They&#039;re goal is to sell colorful coins.&nbsp; They would be fools to take pictures that did anything that flattened or deadened the colors.&nbsp; Just setting my camera on &quot;vivid&quot; or a hyped &quot;custom&quot; as opposed to &quot;neutral&quot; would accomplish most the differences you are seeing.</p><p><br /></p><p>All that being said, I played with the pix using GIMP.&nbsp; Just using the saturation, here is the number I had to use to turn the seller&#039;s pix into an approximation of your pix.&nbsp; Granted, this is an approximation, but it is better than a SWAG.</p><p><br /></p><p>1. -30</p><p>2. -30</p><p>3. -50</p><p>4. -40</p><p>5. -30</p><p>6. -70</p><p><br /></p><p>My opinion would be that #3 and #6 went too far for sure.&nbsp; I will let you draw your own conclusions for the rest.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in