Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Conduitt, post: 7805239, member: 109923&quot;]I think it must just be the younger portrait. I have a similar issue with this coin, which is listed under Philip II on Wildwinds but Philip I on Ocre with &#039;bust of Philip II&#039; <a href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.4.ph_i.226" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.4.ph_i.226" rel="nofollow">http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.4.ph_i.226</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Both were IMP M IVL PHILIPPVS, so why else is this Philip II other than the portrait?</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Philip II Antoninianus</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1340568[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Rome. Silver. Bust of Philip II, IMP M IVL PHILIPPVS AVG. Sol, radiate, advancing left, raising right hand and holding whip in left hand, AETERNIT IMPER (RIC IV Philip I 226).</b></p><p><b><br /></b></p><p>Even [USER=75143]@hotwheelsearl[/USER]&#039;s link quotes &quot;The Reference: Krzyżanowska I/7–8<b> (as Philip II)</b>&quot;[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in