Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Petra-Nabetaean Aretas IV 9 BC - 40AD
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 1036256, member: 57463"]No, it is not Greek. You can tell by the lettering. It looks like Phoenician, not like Greek. Also, if you go here (<a href="http://nabataea.net/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://nabataea.net/" rel="nofollow">http://nabataea.net/</a>) you will find out more than you cared to know. For one thing, they traded widely in everything. Also, when the Romans came, they abandoned Petra and evaporated back into the desert. </p><p><br /></p><p>The "mystery" of the Nabatean "empire" comes from our own expectations of "empires" being made by the sword. We want kings, borders, armies, and all that. That is the warrior or guardian mentality. The trader's way is different from that. </p><p><br /></p><p>This is a problem we have in numismatics because of the wider culture we are in. Not much has been written well about business. There were Benjamin Franklin (<a href="http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bdorsey1/41docs/52-fra.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bdorsey1/41docs/52-fra.html" rel="nofollow">The Way to Wealth here</a>) and Adam Smith, of course. Then Herbert Spencer. In the previous generation, Ayn Rand was better known than Jane Jacobs but Jacobs's <i>The Economy of Cities</i> and <i>Systems of Survival</i> should be classics. Today, we have Dierdre McCloskey's <i>Bourgeois Virtues</i>. I am sure that you never heard of any of these in school -- but you know of Karl Marx... </p><p><br /></p><p>Then, we try to figure out the history of money. </p><p><br /></p><p>A hundred and 150 years ago, British numismatists did great work organizing the artifacts of the past, but none of them ever worked in a shop. So, they made some serious mistakes trying to understand the modes and methods of ancient coinage in commerce.</p><p><br /></p><p>Hey, look, I'm standing on soap box... where did that come from? ... </p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, the coin does not have Greek letters. Meshorer called it "Aramaic" and he would know. If you goto CoinArchives and enter "Nabataea" or <a href="http://www.coinarchives.com/a/results.php?search=nabataea&s=0&results=100" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinarchives.com/a/results.php?search=nabataea&s=0&results=100" rel="nofollow">follow this link</a> you can see the full range of their issues. You might wonder why such successful traders struck such unimpressive coins. You might wonder why coins were invented in Lydia, not Phoenicia...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="kaparthy, post: 1036256, member: 57463"]No, it is not Greek. You can tell by the lettering. It looks like Phoenician, not like Greek. Also, if you go here ([url]http://nabataea.net/[/url]) you will find out more than you cared to know. For one thing, they traded widely in everything. Also, when the Romans came, they abandoned Petra and evaporated back into the desert. The "mystery" of the Nabatean "empire" comes from our own expectations of "empires" being made by the sword. We want kings, borders, armies, and all that. That is the warrior or guardian mentality. The trader's way is different from that. This is a problem we have in numismatics because of the wider culture we are in. Not much has been written well about business. There were Benjamin Franklin ([URL="http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/bdorsey1/41docs/52-fra.html"]The Way to Wealth here[/URL]) and Adam Smith, of course. Then Herbert Spencer. In the previous generation, Ayn Rand was better known than Jane Jacobs but Jacobs's [I]The Economy of Cities[/I] and [I]Systems of Survival[/I] should be classics. Today, we have Dierdre McCloskey's [I]Bourgeois Virtues[/I]. I am sure that you never heard of any of these in school -- but you know of Karl Marx... Then, we try to figure out the history of money. A hundred and 150 years ago, British numismatists did great work organizing the artifacts of the past, but none of them ever worked in a shop. So, they made some serious mistakes trying to understand the modes and methods of ancient coinage in commerce. Hey, look, I'm standing on soap box... where did that come from? ... Anyway, the coin does not have Greek letters. Meshorer called it "Aramaic" and he would know. If you goto CoinArchives and enter "Nabataea" or [URL="http://www.coinarchives.com/a/results.php?search=nabataea&s=0&results=100"]follow this link[/URL] you can see the full range of their issues. You might wonder why such successful traders struck such unimpressive coins. You might wonder why coins were invented in Lydia, not Phoenicia...[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Petra-Nabetaean Aretas IV 9 BC - 40AD
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...