Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Juan Blanco, post: 1570835, member: 41665&quot;]With all due respect, &#039;sometimes&#039; not generally.</p><p><a href="http://www.stanford.edu/~scheidel/NumTable.pdf" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.stanford.edu/~scheidel/NumTable.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.stanford.edu/~scheidel/NumTable.pdf</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The Epigram and BoR 6:6 indicates correctly, here: <i>Asses </i>and <i>Denarius</i>.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>The nutritional value of Wheat being constant, no different after two thousand years, the k/Cal of a certain measure valued in Silver (salary) is fairly easy to estimate.&nbsp; The ratio may fluctuate, that&#039;s certainly what&#039;s interesting here, and <i>when exactly &#039;PMs are most dear/despised&#039; </i>(relatively speaking) should be of the greatest interest to bullionists.</p><p><br /></p><p><u>Also:</u></p><p>I need to correct the Fine Silver Weight, accordingly.</p><p>AD 85-107 Denarius weight: 3.27 grs.&nbsp;&nbsp; Purity: 93.5% <b>Fine Ag = 3.04 grams</b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in