Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Perusing Peroz
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2956377, member: 19463"]A fit of excessive bidding brought me five new Sasanian drachms - all the same - all different. All five are Peroz 459-484 AD using his third crown (wings) and having a barbarized version of the king's name at reverse left where a date would be on a dated coin. They are from five different mints. All are decent examples but fully cleaned and bright making them hard to photograph. Some are easy to read while others have voids caused by the thin flans and competition for metal by the two dies with winners determined by the alignment and strength of the strike. Some are made messy by slight doubling or dies sliding when struck. Usually we 'grade' coins by wear but I most strongly believe that strike is much more important with Sasanian. It makes no difference if a little detail has worn away if important details were never present due to voids from striking. For example, lets look at this drachm from the Court Mint (followed the king) BBA.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]722826[/ATTACH]</p><p>Note the strong shoulders on the portrait. The 3H die axis (on all of these 5 coins) makes the voids caused by the shoulders fall on the right side so we will show a rotated close up of that part of the coin making it easier to read the mintmark.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]722833[/ATTACH]</p><p>This image shows the two 'dents' left where there was not enough metal to fill both those shoulders and the reverse. Just below the left void are the two B's which look a bit like nested allen wrenches or hex keys.</p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hex_key" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hex_key" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hex_key</a></p><p>If you look very carefully you may see the slightest trace of the A inside that left void. It is not worn off; it just never was struck due to unfortunate alignment with those shoulders. Doe that make the coin undesirable or uncollectable? I might call this drachm high grade were it not for this one little problem.</p><p><br /></p><p>Our second example is from the AT mint attributed to Azerbaijan. The coin is of similar grade but the left void from the shoulder wipes out the lower legs of the right side attendant leaving the mintmark intact. Note that the left side (rear) shoulder was not cut as deeply as the other so it did not create a void wiping out the upper part of the attendant. Coins of Peroz often come on large flans centered with varying degrees of accuracy. I see this as a nice coin choosing not to hold the centering against it. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]722845[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Making the close photos was fun so you get to see this one, too. Remembering that these mintmarks read right to left you now can see the full A (rather like an upside down Greek Pi<b> Π</b>) incase you didn't know what you missed on the BBA coin.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]722851[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>The point of this post is that there are things that may or may not make a difference to you as a collector. Do you care whether the mintmark is bold or is simply 'identifiable' enough. If you only want one Sasanian coin or one Peroz (an interesting guy some might even admire compared to some of his ilk) perhaps this detail means nothing. Will the price of the coins reflect such things? My scan of online prices suggests that it makes little difference to many people with not knowing or caring that the coins are mintmarked. </p><p><br /></p><p>I like Peroz. His coins are midway between the early Sasanians like Shapur I who conquered Valerian and the super common late coins of Khusru II most often seen. Show your Peroz or your Sasanians with voided details whether or not you care. I have the others if anyone is interested in different mints but I suspect this thread has already driven off most. For the record, Peroz was issuing these good silver half dollar size coins at the time Rome was busy 'falling' and issuing little scraps of copper and rare gold. A study of Sasanian history hardly makes you want to call them civilized unless you compare them with the other options of that day.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2956377, member: 19463"]A fit of excessive bidding brought me five new Sasanian drachms - all the same - all different. All five are Peroz 459-484 AD using his third crown (wings) and having a barbarized version of the king's name at reverse left where a date would be on a dated coin. They are from five different mints. All are decent examples but fully cleaned and bright making them hard to photograph. Some are easy to read while others have voids caused by the thin flans and competition for metal by the two dies with winners determined by the alignment and strength of the strike. Some are made messy by slight doubling or dies sliding when struck. Usually we 'grade' coins by wear but I most strongly believe that strike is much more important with Sasanian. It makes no difference if a little detail has worn away if important details were never present due to voids from striking. For example, lets look at this drachm from the Court Mint (followed the king) BBA. [ATTACH=full]722826[/ATTACH] Note the strong shoulders on the portrait. The 3H die axis (on all of these 5 coins) makes the voids caused by the shoulders fall on the right side so we will show a rotated close up of that part of the coin making it easier to read the mintmark. [ATTACH=full]722833[/ATTACH] This image shows the two 'dents' left where there was not enough metal to fill both those shoulders and the reverse. Just below the left void are the two B's which look a bit like nested allen wrenches or hex keys. [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hex_key[/url] If you look very carefully you may see the slightest trace of the A inside that left void. It is not worn off; it just never was struck due to unfortunate alignment with those shoulders. Doe that make the coin undesirable or uncollectable? I might call this drachm high grade were it not for this one little problem. Our second example is from the AT mint attributed to Azerbaijan. The coin is of similar grade but the left void from the shoulder wipes out the lower legs of the right side attendant leaving the mintmark intact. Note that the left side (rear) shoulder was not cut as deeply as the other so it did not create a void wiping out the upper part of the attendant. Coins of Peroz often come on large flans centered with varying degrees of accuracy. I see this as a nice coin choosing not to hold the centering against it. [ATTACH=full]722845[/ATTACH] Making the close photos was fun so you get to see this one, too. Remembering that these mintmarks read right to left you now can see the full A (rather like an upside down Greek Pi[B] Π[/B]) incase you didn't know what you missed on the BBA coin. [ATTACH=full]722851[/ATTACH] The point of this post is that there are things that may or may not make a difference to you as a collector. Do you care whether the mintmark is bold or is simply 'identifiable' enough. If you only want one Sasanian coin or one Peroz (an interesting guy some might even admire compared to some of his ilk) perhaps this detail means nothing. Will the price of the coins reflect such things? My scan of online prices suggests that it makes little difference to many people with not knowing or caring that the coins are mintmarked. I like Peroz. His coins are midway between the early Sasanians like Shapur I who conquered Valerian and the super common late coins of Khusru II most often seen. Show your Peroz or your Sasanians with voided details whether or not you care. I have the others if anyone is interested in different mints but I suspect this thread has already driven off most. For the record, Peroz was issuing these good silver half dollar size coins at the time Rome was busy 'falling' and issuing little scraps of copper and rare gold. A study of Sasanian history hardly makes you want to call them civilized unless you compare them with the other options of that day.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Perusing Peroz
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...