Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="Blaubart, post: 1610836, member: 37498"]This case was a trainwreck on both sides. The plaintiff might have won if only she had been better prepared.  She's using a price written on the back of a business card as evidence?  And the fax with a blurb scribbled on it?  Plus, she waits FOUR YEARS to bring suit against the guy?  Who's to say she didn't alter the coin in that time?  Did she say she was a Realtor?  Or is she just "in the real estate business"?  If that's the case, she might work for a real estate company in any capacity.  But, if she is actually a "Realtor", she should know about caveat emptor, and thorough documentation, and civil lawsuits.  Even if she's in the real estate business as an investor, she should know more than the apparently does. The defendant is an idiot.  For a person that was allegedly "one of the original members of PCGS", why didn't he know what the acronym stands for?  Even if he didn't hear the term "Chloroxed" before, I'm 100% certain he knows what they were referring to.  But, I guess he was smart enough to know she didn't have a case against him, so he didn't really have to do much. Did the bailiff remove the coin from the flip?  It looks like that me.  I think it was in a flip when she took it out of her purse, then he handed just the coin to the judge.  Stupid bailiff...[/QUOTE]