Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
people say it is fake
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="akeady, post: 2671573, member: 83175"]It's RIC 159/BMC 162 (illustrated). This is what the BMC has to say about it:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ARVDnPRhvtmbsDuZ8m809nsX_XtHxIBg8G3_KrXaGHdCjcXyDTRbjWVt4KiPNY04S9PPixEQWY9q4pWOzFeUFua2OCJOexe0OwRFGUK8Iw_-zHfDiZnvgQUhqzn8TWdmBMvgw8f-Vv3l97VblYeBw4yy_yzDO7RL3PW2x68liuGM-Ui9JBgTpAM17DQzXF4CGyu3xC7kXp4zEMgwDLd9T-zqjhIw2qf7A9gcdkt7HPIGx8FPwodGqJoJimvy8wg1pg1ohBW9cfTKPC4z4KCWqgSYmgTicWLll4xGlB0VZ0vi3Oyp66drIPokFuG95TV4TBRpr535rXqGJKGW0gYvP-dPv-KvJU7h5KunUbh9WrVqa0O0KZ6D8CRbKZfKkVvv-h0UA_fANayzKZxT_78oiS6ibF2gRDl9AmhIzWBvFKPXb5WVYbS-8rzUV5BPhFw2oJUkhFNDQVbqjyOex8gbRzBptks_9LnEzPBn7VZ4UsEZjmnbxlkcp1oLrWQZOZQggoKWLU48DoueO0g92mbAqMekj_Z7RiU6Cw0M09q-mxgRvlJzGzxyMOuNf6zgiZJu1JUcvOoSTvwRVniq3dajqMcEfM5-sBEFC6YbuKm7SjeR86TUKfJmzA=w1764-h993-no" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>I don't see that it says it doesn't exist - it may be suggesting that the variety with drapery on left shoulder (rather than aegis) doesn't exist.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is the BMC coin:</p><p><img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/CLhPU2Bf9FUu-LCK0ImWNw9EsHgaJUBCK-LAiYJRBR3IxPuzJkyO3roXsbj3L2VKm4x6kM5F1WRraRX0bLag2on9HfyaMAu6ANhfFT2Ce-nD3dRR_k_PTlXxnibg9wDGSARjPha8hig0cMwsGwRoyiigonh-Fwestt1W74RFp8WXlf2PegEmb4Kfheay2IIc2xqq6ihhsGYz9oWv8QqaGPr3Y6NpHcrjAz4zg5I8ZOkNbjn0kkCKgmK7MJYL9jsVlrZv3W57vNU7i3IBJLJmUBKyRjBD1GDxvk4Qib8nLS2AS2DzDmYXW8ZQmsY6Yiu4xJ-sFMrLcTy01yMAL8z0fgzVdkgbTs9-ihCOrCORqi7ZLclxMp_-UNJc46m-UT782ckwcvuMa59MmNggIhwEagved_M8AXqMFiduslQwjbrlrI_L3D4lgfv_W6dRY3XWjAyLJMVxsX7qhf-eGlvXkQKtmB6iZBmwqGMQFOG5-ADea6Z3P9oYDPN6P-uWRXO3z3vG4ukZQXOPJvqr-p6FCbvio8kLe4mb4ZRR_U3pqT4X6dMInA3iRdd00m3X6PEexgD0-eqdV8dnGKcPM_2XczJ44t7Zgh47eprZj_2L4hK2e25ArLwG5w=w573-h1018-no" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>CNG has sold some examples of this type (at least 3) - it looks like a pic of one of these is stuck between the side pics of ro1974's coin in a post up above!</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, are people reading something different in BMC? Is there a different note somewhere else? It seems to me to question the existence of Cohen 377, not their own BMC 162 (also RIC 159).</p><p><br /></p><p>ATB,</p><p>Aidan.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="akeady, post: 2671573, member: 83175"]It's RIC 159/BMC 162 (illustrated). This is what the BMC has to say about it: [IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ARVDnPRhvtmbsDuZ8m809nsX_XtHxIBg8G3_KrXaGHdCjcXyDTRbjWVt4KiPNY04S9PPixEQWY9q4pWOzFeUFua2OCJOexe0OwRFGUK8Iw_-zHfDiZnvgQUhqzn8TWdmBMvgw8f-Vv3l97VblYeBw4yy_yzDO7RL3PW2x68liuGM-Ui9JBgTpAM17DQzXF4CGyu3xC7kXp4zEMgwDLd9T-zqjhIw2qf7A9gcdkt7HPIGx8FPwodGqJoJimvy8wg1pg1ohBW9cfTKPC4z4KCWqgSYmgTicWLll4xGlB0VZ0vi3Oyp66drIPokFuG95TV4TBRpr535rXqGJKGW0gYvP-dPv-KvJU7h5KunUbh9WrVqa0O0KZ6D8CRbKZfKkVvv-h0UA_fANayzKZxT_78oiS6ibF2gRDl9AmhIzWBvFKPXb5WVYbS-8rzUV5BPhFw2oJUkhFNDQVbqjyOex8gbRzBptks_9LnEzPBn7VZ4UsEZjmnbxlkcp1oLrWQZOZQggoKWLU48DoueO0g92mbAqMekj_Z7RiU6Cw0M09q-mxgRvlJzGzxyMOuNf6zgiZJu1JUcvOoSTvwRVniq3dajqMcEfM5-sBEFC6YbuKm7SjeR86TUKfJmzA=w1764-h993-no[/IMG] I don't see that it says it doesn't exist - it may be suggesting that the variety with drapery on left shoulder (rather than aegis) doesn't exist. This is the BMC coin: [IMG]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/CLhPU2Bf9FUu-LCK0ImWNw9EsHgaJUBCK-LAiYJRBR3IxPuzJkyO3roXsbj3L2VKm4x6kM5F1WRraRX0bLag2on9HfyaMAu6ANhfFT2Ce-nD3dRR_k_PTlXxnibg9wDGSARjPha8hig0cMwsGwRoyiigonh-Fwestt1W74RFp8WXlf2PegEmb4Kfheay2IIc2xqq6ihhsGYz9oWv8QqaGPr3Y6NpHcrjAz4zg5I8ZOkNbjn0kkCKgmK7MJYL9jsVlrZv3W57vNU7i3IBJLJmUBKyRjBD1GDxvk4Qib8nLS2AS2DzDmYXW8ZQmsY6Yiu4xJ-sFMrLcTy01yMAL8z0fgzVdkgbTs9-ihCOrCORqi7ZLclxMp_-UNJc46m-UT782ckwcvuMa59MmNggIhwEagved_M8AXqMFiduslQwjbrlrI_L3D4lgfv_W6dRY3XWjAyLJMVxsX7qhf-eGlvXkQKtmB6iZBmwqGMQFOG5-ADea6Z3P9oYDPN6P-uWRXO3z3vG4ukZQXOPJvqr-p6FCbvio8kLe4mb4ZRR_U3pqT4X6dMInA3iRdd00m3X6PEexgD0-eqdV8dnGKcPM_2XczJ44t7Zgh47eprZj_2L4hK2e25ArLwG5w=w573-h1018-no[/IMG] CNG has sold some examples of this type (at least 3) - it looks like a pic of one of these is stuck between the side pics of ro1974's coin in a post up above! Anyway, are people reading something different in BMC? Is there a different note somewhere else? It seems to me to question the existence of Cohen 377, not their own BMC 162 (also RIC 159). ATB, Aidan.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
people say it is fake
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...