Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dchjr, post: 2574175, member: 76379&quot;]The 1983 doesn&#039;t look like it.&nbsp; I assume the bottom two pictures are the 1982 cent.&nbsp; These pictures DO look like extra thickness and separation, so I would say yes.&nbsp; It also helps to only post for one coin at a time and to include pictures of the entire coin for comparison.&nbsp; Machine doubling would look flat and shelf-like as many will say.&nbsp; Here is a picture that has helped me distinguish the difference, but this takes practice to discern sometimes.&nbsp; Another good reference is Wexler&#039;s website.&nbsp; Check out the &#039;worthless doubling&#039; also on his site.&nbsp; <a href="http://doubleddie.com/58222.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://doubleddie.com/58222.html" rel="nofollow">http://doubleddie.com/58222.html</a></p><p>[ATTACH=full]557286[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in