Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;jtwax, post: 21262, member: 696&quot;]And here are the results.....</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1941-S FS-024.6 == MS63 3323 Steps (This is the Inverted Mintmark Variety that has been debunked by CONECA recently but I will be conducting my own research.)</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1939 r38 DDR-006 == PR63 5555 Steps (Nice early date med/large spread.)</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1950 DDR-002 == PR62 6666 Steps (This is a scarce and expensive die.)</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1955-D OMM-001 == MS64 3323 Steps OMM-005 (Hmmm, I must be slipping, but on the bright side I did not have that OMM and OMM-1 is pretty easily obtainable at any given time. Not bad steps for this variety either.)</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1955-D OMM-002 == MS63 3303 Steps</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1955-D OMM-003a DDR-003 == MS63 4323 Steps</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1955-D OMM-009 == Not OMM-009, did not slab. (Hmmmm)</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1955-D OMM-010 == MS63 3324 Steps (Scarcer OMM, last one I saw went for well over $100 on ebay some time ago.)</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1956 FS-035.2 QDR-018 == MS64 5335 (Awesome EDS with quad spread on reverse. This coin is blast white.)</p><p><br /></p><p>5c 1963 FS-37.3 == MS63 4335 (Another nice DDR with a triple spread. This coin is also blast white.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in