Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="lordmarcovan, post: 4952383, member: 10461"]I find this objectionable. <img src="https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/G14AAOSw5bxcUbPP/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> I do not find this objectionable.  Tacky looking, perhaps, but not ethically objectionable.(The use of red on the slab label is a poor choice, since a red border denoted a "problem" coin on some other companies’ slab labels in the past.  But that's irrelevant.)<img src="https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/d9MAAOSw1zVfhjii/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> Interestingly, I also found this.  Note the word "hoard" on the label has been changed to "collection", though “hoard” is still used on the papers. I think this is better.  Perhaps NGC got a clue.  Maybe they got complaints about the fake "hoard" pedigree?  Who knows.<img src="https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/QasAAOSwoPRfB0RF/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> Random examples plucked from eBay. No aspersions cast on the sellers.  And I'm not targeting NGC specifically.  I'm sure PCGS has made a few of their own faux pas with promotional labels. (I was going to credit the image sources but botched those links.)[/QUOTE]