Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
PCI target toning and other randomness
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="NorthKorea, post: 2492313, member: 29643"]I decided to do a search for PCI on eBay, and beyond a ton of boards, I saw mixed in a PCGS MS64 coin that said PCI on it. This got me to thinking a few things:</p><p><br /></p><p>1) Obviously PCI holders allow gas in somehow, or else that would make no sense... which led me to wonder why PCGS would grade *any* orange or yellow toned Morgans?</p><p><br /></p><p>2) Given the gas permeable aspects of PCI holders, why would people leave nicely toned coins in them? I would think this aspect would accelerate the terminal toning process moreso than an alternate company's holder.</p><p><br /></p><p>3) Are the holders themselves causing the toning process to speed up beyond what would be experienced in "normal" holders?</p><p><br /></p><p>4) Given 1 & 3, why don't people submit Morgans to PCI specifically to have them tone? If this is indeed done, wouldn't that be considered AT?</p><p><br /></p><p>To the other randomness...</p><p><br /></p><p>In the last week, I acquired two 1883-O 36a VAMs, one SEGS graded and the other raw. The raw one looks either cleaned very harshly or MS60. (Seller had listed it as PL, but it clearly isn't in hand, but they were gracious enough to offer a partial refund, which I gladly accepted.) I don't know how else to explain it. The obverse looks UPL with a bunch of scratches (which includes an "x")... and the back has frosted fields with one large interruption... which is PL mirror. I thought the reverse looked a bit frosty in the fields, but thought maybe it was just a matter of poor photography. When I got the coin in hand, the contrast was a lot more significant.</p><p><br /></p><p>Did the 1883-O series have super polished dies with specially prepared planchets? These aren't proofs, since I know those were rumored to exist, as far as I can tell.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/QPQAAOSwaB5XoVdT/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/vEQAAOSwtnpXoVdY/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>The SEGS one was an overpay (offered about 95% of what you'd expect for NGC in the same grade), but I was actually quite pleased in hand. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> The only issue I have with the coin is a big black mark across the surface. That got me to thinking... Is the coin possibly MS details because of the black mark? It covers about 12-15% of the coin surface.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/FyMAAOSwqfNXkCtd/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> <img src="http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/-SMAAOSw0fhXkCtl/s-l1600.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>So, all in all, I'm pleased with my purchases, and I believe the SEGS coin may have sold quicker if the seller had color balanced to the lavender on the front side, a little better. I don't have photos of the coins in hand, but I'll do my best in a follow-up post to show my impression of how they looked in hand with color balancing.</p><p><br /></p><p>Personally, I like the SEGS holder, and it's too bad PCGS doesn't buy them out for the holder patent. Then again, PCGS seems to be doing a great job of improving their holders on their own.</p><p><br /></p><p>I decided to submit the raw along with my cousin's coins he found in a fire destroyed safe to ANACS under their 10 for $99 + $29 service. I hope Paul's group is able to conserve the coins that I sent in. None are especially important, but they represent a nice array of environmental issues, and I'd like to see what the conservation fee really covers. I included a very gross looking Philippines coin with thick verdigris (or possibly paint, who knows) to see what extend the conservation fee covers. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="NorthKorea, post: 2492313, member: 29643"]I decided to do a search for PCI on eBay, and beyond a ton of boards, I saw mixed in a PCGS MS64 coin that said PCI on it. This got me to thinking a few things: 1) Obviously PCI holders allow gas in somehow, or else that would make no sense... which led me to wonder why PCGS would grade *any* orange or yellow toned Morgans? 2) Given the gas permeable aspects of PCI holders, why would people leave nicely toned coins in them? I would think this aspect would accelerate the terminal toning process moreso than an alternate company's holder. 3) Are the holders themselves causing the toning process to speed up beyond what would be experienced in "normal" holders? 4) Given 1 & 3, why don't people submit Morgans to PCI specifically to have them tone? If this is indeed done, wouldn't that be considered AT? To the other randomness... In the last week, I acquired two 1883-O 36a VAMs, one SEGS graded and the other raw. The raw one looks either cleaned very harshly or MS60. (Seller had listed it as PL, but it clearly isn't in hand, but they were gracious enough to offer a partial refund, which I gladly accepted.) I don't know how else to explain it. The obverse looks UPL with a bunch of scratches (which includes an "x")... and the back has frosted fields with one large interruption... which is PL mirror. I thought the reverse looked a bit frosty in the fields, but thought maybe it was just a matter of poor photography. When I got the coin in hand, the contrast was a lot more significant. Did the 1883-O series have super polished dies with specially prepared planchets? These aren't proofs, since I know those were rumored to exist, as far as I can tell. [IMG]http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/QPQAAOSwaB5XoVdT/s-l1600.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/vEQAAOSwtnpXoVdY/s-l1600.jpg[/IMG] The SEGS one was an overpay (offered about 95% of what you'd expect for NGC in the same grade), but I was actually quite pleased in hand. :D The only issue I have with the coin is a big black mark across the surface. That got me to thinking... Is the coin possibly MS details because of the black mark? It covers about 12-15% of the coin surface. [IMG]http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/FyMAAOSwqfNXkCtd/s-l1600.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/-SMAAOSw0fhXkCtl/s-l1600.jpg[/IMG] So, all in all, I'm pleased with my purchases, and I believe the SEGS coin may have sold quicker if the seller had color balanced to the lavender on the front side, a little better. I don't have photos of the coins in hand, but I'll do my best in a follow-up post to show my impression of how they looked in hand with color balancing. Personally, I like the SEGS holder, and it's too bad PCGS doesn't buy them out for the holder patent. Then again, PCGS seems to be doing a great job of improving their holders on their own. I decided to submit the raw along with my cousin's coins he found in a fire destroyed safe to ANACS under their 10 for $99 + $29 service. I hope Paul's group is able to conserve the coins that I sent in. None are especially important, but they represent a nice array of environmental issues, and I'd like to see what the conservation fee really covers. I included a very gross looking Philippines coin with thick verdigris (or possibly paint, who knows) to see what extend the conservation fee covers. :D[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
PCI target toning and other randomness
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...