Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
PCGS vs. NGC ???
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Sundance79, post: 2865010, member: 84413"]I only buy PCGS slabbed coins. (When I buy a slabbed coin) With that said, I still buy the coin and not the slab. </p><p><br /></p><p>Case in point, a couple of weeks ago I was looking to buy a Walking Liberty half for my type set. Year wasn’t that important but I wanted a great example of a Walker. The key point I was looking at was the thumb and index fingers on the left hand. Well I looked at a lot of MS65, 66 and 67s at the show. </p><p><br /></p><p>I was shocked and just how poorly struck some of the MS66 and 67s were. There was no detail at all in the thumb and index fingers, and they looked like just a blob.</p><p><br /></p><p>I ended up buying what I thought was the best example of a Walking Liberty at the entire show. It was a 1940 MS65. The thumb and index fingers were clear as day.</p><p><br /></p><p>According to the grading standards, strike is to be taken into consideration at grades MS65 and higher. So a poorly struck coin shouldn’t grade higher. I know that some years are notorious for poorly struck coins, but that’s no excuse to give away higher grades for those years because of that. An MS67 coin should look the same across all years of a particular type. And an PCGS MS67 (or any grade for that matter) should look the same as an NGC MS67 coin. And in a perfect world and PCGS MS67, NGC MS67 and a fairly graded unslabbed MS67 should all be priced about the same. But as we all know, the world isn’t perfect.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Sundance79, post: 2865010, member: 84413"]I only buy PCGS slabbed coins. (When I buy a slabbed coin) With that said, I still buy the coin and not the slab. Case in point, a couple of weeks ago I was looking to buy a Walking Liberty half for my type set. Year wasn’t that important but I wanted a great example of a Walker. The key point I was looking at was the thumb and index fingers on the left hand. Well I looked at a lot of MS65, 66 and 67s at the show. I was shocked and just how poorly struck some of the MS66 and 67s were. There was no detail at all in the thumb and index fingers, and they looked like just a blob. I ended up buying what I thought was the best example of a Walking Liberty at the entire show. It was a 1940 MS65. The thumb and index fingers were clear as day. According to the grading standards, strike is to be taken into consideration at grades MS65 and higher. So a poorly struck coin shouldn’t grade higher. I know that some years are notorious for poorly struck coins, but that’s no excuse to give away higher grades for those years because of that. An MS67 coin should look the same across all years of a particular type. And an PCGS MS67 (or any grade for that matter) should look the same as an NGC MS67 coin. And in a perfect world and PCGS MS67, NGC MS67 and a fairly graded unslabbed MS67 should all be priced about the same. But as we all know, the world isn’t perfect.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
PCGS vs. NGC ???
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...