Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;princeofwaldo, post: 1270219, member: 24091&quot;]Didn&#039;t know that.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>I wonder what collectors didn&#039;t like about the old holders aside from them being significantly smaller than their peers.&nbsp; I thought the grade of plastic in them was probably superior to either PCGS or NGC.&nbsp; When stacked together and viewed sideways, you could see through the entire 2&quot; width of the holder with no observable distortion, something pretty hard to do with cheap plastic.&nbsp; They also stacked nicely, something that NGC holders in particular seem to have problems with.&nbsp; I&#039;m not even certain the new ANACS holders will stack at all, never owned one much less two of them.</p><p><br /></p><p>Of the two gorilla graders, --NGC and PCGS-- the better plastic would have to be in the NGC holder in my opinion.&nbsp; It is much more brittle than the PCGS plastic, hence a proclivity to chip if the holder is dropped on the floor.&nbsp; But the harder plastic makes the holder much less susceptible to scratches than a PCGS holder, which means over any period of time the NGC holder is going to look more attractive.&nbsp; I also think the NGC holograph is much cooler looking.&nbsp; Hey, that&#039;s an important criteria don&#039;t you think??[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in