Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;vipergts2, post: 190660, member: 3881&quot;]<b>surprised</b></p><p><br /></p><p>After reading this thread, it got my curiosity up. I checked the population report at NGC and was a little suprised, especially the 2006 state quarters. I figured that proof 69 would account for the bulk of the submissions, but I was wrong. The silver Quarters had a higher mix of p70,s than clad, but I was surprised to see that 70,s and 69,s weren&#039;t that far apart. In some cases There were more 70,s than 69,s. For older state quarters it was about 60% proof 69 and 40% proof 70.</p><p>On a side note I was surprised by some of the lower graded coins. there was at least 1 proof 61 and a few proof 63,s. They were either just in the set with some good ones or knowbody bothered to look at them.</p><p>How bad would a proof 61 quarter look?:thumb:[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in