Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
PCGS SET REGISTRY, A TOTAL WASTE OF TIME!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="calcol, post: 25408633, member: 77639"]I enjoy both registries. PCGS restricting their registry to coins they’ve certified is not a big deal for me. When I collect a series, I make it all PCGS or all NGC. The PCGS series go in their registry; the NGC in their registry.</p><p><br /></p><p>The point assignment methods are different between the two registries. NGC uses an algorithm based on rarity of type, date and grade, and market value. The points for a particular coin can change over time. Presumably, this could cause a set to change in ranking.</p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS assigns a weight to each coin in a series and multiplies the weight times the grade of each coin in a set then sums these products to get a score. There can be bonuses for things like color in copper or top of pop. The weights were assigned long ago and appear to never change. Some are now ridiculous. For example, an 1881-CC Morgan has twice the weight of an 1890-CC or 1891-CC.</p><p><br /></p><p>Another difference is that to receive an annual best set award at PCGS, the participant must have at least 95% set completion. At NGC, percent completion doesn’t matter. If you have the best set, you’ll get an award.</p><p><br /></p><p>Cal[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="calcol, post: 25408633, member: 77639"]I enjoy both registries. PCGS restricting their registry to coins they’ve certified is not a big deal for me. When I collect a series, I make it all PCGS or all NGC. The PCGS series go in their registry; the NGC in their registry. The point assignment methods are different between the two registries. NGC uses an algorithm based on rarity of type, date and grade, and market value. The points for a particular coin can change over time. Presumably, this could cause a set to change in ranking. PCGS assigns a weight to each coin in a series and multiplies the weight times the grade of each coin in a set then sums these products to get a score. There can be bonuses for things like color in copper or top of pop. The weights were assigned long ago and appear to never change. Some are now ridiculous. For example, an 1881-CC Morgan has twice the weight of an 1890-CC or 1891-CC. Another difference is that to receive an annual best set award at PCGS, the participant must have at least 95% set completion. At NGC, percent completion doesn’t matter. If you have the best set, you’ll get an award. Cal[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
PCGS SET REGISTRY, A TOTAL WASTE OF TIME!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...