Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Coinman1981, post: 701574, member: 20610&quot;]Rzage,</p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t know if I&#039;m just too picky or if what I am seeing is there. My thinking is that if it predates the &quot;genuine&quot; holder era, then PCGS would have simply rejected the coin for encapsulation because of environmental damage, if it really is porosity. If it was during the &quot;genuine&quot; slab era, I would have seen it there. I thought, at first, maybe the G-6 is a net grade, but this coin really is in between Good and Very Good based on Photograde and ANA, so I am now thinking it is not a net grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>I tried doing scans and photos last night and just could not focus either enough to post here for any visual guidance. </p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you for your thoughts![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in