Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;lordmarcovan, post: 25685135, member: 10461&quot;]Here’s hopin’.&nbsp; I confess I too was always a fan of the old “glamour shots” style.</p><p><br /></p><p>I’ve mostly abandoned PCGS for NGC in the last year or two, however, after finding NGC’s Photovision service (but <i>not</i> their cheaper “Internet Imaged” tier) to be superior to PCGS’ offerings.</p><p><br /></p><p>The fact that my submissions include a fair proportion of Ancients (which, as we know, PCGS does not encapsulate) was another deciding factor in my switch.&nbsp; Now NGC gets <i>all</i> my raw submissions, not just the Ancients.&nbsp; But I recently did submit an already-graded coin to PCGS for reholdering and TruView.</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.pcgs.com/cert/73263326" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.pcgs.com/cert/73263326" rel="nofollow">The images were OK</a>.&nbsp; PCGS only gives you the TrueView montage and one large obverse pic, whereas NGC gives you the Photovision montage plus large individual obverse <i>and</i> reverse pics (and you get the slab shots on the cert page as well).</p><p><br /></p><p>Weirdly, the PCGS TrueView of that Saint has (as of this posting) only a plain white background instead of the usual TrueView-branded wallpaper.&nbsp; Eh, that doesn’t matter so much to me, as long as I got useable pics, which I did.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in