Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;brg5658, post: 4990328, member: 29751&quot;]Your images don&#039;t show a <i>ton</i> of red shift - but it&#039;s certainly there and noticeable!&nbsp; Your coin also isn&#039;t deeply or vibrantly toned (light, pastel, satiny surfaces seem to be more accurately displayed in TrueViews).&nbsp; An aside, it is &quot;Tru<b>e</b>View&quot;, not &quot;TruView&quot; as so many tend to mistype.</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not the only one who has complained about their consistent red-shifted images.&nbsp; I have been complaining for at least 6-7 years, even direct to Phil Arnold, and nothing ever changes. </p><p><br /></p><p>I think it almost <i>must </i>be a <i>combination </i>of their light sources <i>and </i>their post-processing.&nbsp; I don&#039;t understand how they can be getting some of the photos they are without boosting saturation on some images.&nbsp; They also tend to light toned coins differently from frosty white coins - toned coin images often take on a more axial-like appearance, which overexaggerates colors.&nbsp; There also seems to be a lack of consistency in <i>how </i>red-shifted a coin&#039;s image is...some Morgans seem to be fine, other types of coins - like world coins and medals - seem to suffer from this red-shift sometimes in wildly misleading ways.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in