Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
pcgs grading standards in theory and practice ...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="fizzy, post: 1347225, member: 32632"]thanks for the consideration but they appear beneath the heading </p><p>[h=3]PCGS Grading Standards[/h]at <a href="http://www.pcgs.com/grades.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/grades.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/grades.html</a> so i do understand they are generalized examples, pcgs itself lists it as their standards which i don't think i'm mistaken to understand as criteria, conditions, thresholds. </p><p><br /></p><p>owie's comments led me to check out some ANA "standards" which seem more exacting and higher ... </p><p>The numerical grades, along with their prevailing adjectival grades and descriptions, are as follows:</p><p><br /></p><p><b>MS-63</b> (choice uncirculated): choice quality specimens with minimal weaknesses or blemish readily evident.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>MS-64:</b> choice quality specimens with eye appeal and only the smallest distracting weakness, blemish or bag marks.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>MS-65 </b>(gem uncirculated): sharply struck, hairline-free coins with full luster and no distracting blemishes.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>MS-67:</b> described as “gem” according to official ANA criteria, it is not presently associated with an adjectival equivalent. There is also not a consensus description that is associated with this grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>copied from <a href="http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=21570" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=21570" rel="nofollow">http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=21570</a></p><p><br /></p><p>owie pointed to some sites to check side-by-side comparisons, i'll do that within a week, thanks![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="fizzy, post: 1347225, member: 32632"]thanks for the consideration but they appear beneath the heading [h=3]PCGS Grading Standards[/h]at [url]http://www.pcgs.com/grades.html[/url] so i do understand they are generalized examples, pcgs itself lists it as their standards which i don't think i'm mistaken to understand as criteria, conditions, thresholds. owie's comments led me to check out some ANA "standards" which seem more exacting and higher ... The numerical grades, along with their prevailing adjectival grades and descriptions, are as follows: [B]MS-63[/B] (choice uncirculated): choice quality specimens with minimal weaknesses or blemish readily evident. [B]MS-64:[/B] choice quality specimens with eye appeal and only the smallest distracting weakness, blemish or bag marks. [B]MS-65 [/B](gem uncirculated): sharply struck, hairline-free coins with full luster and no distracting blemishes. [B]MS-67:[/B] described as “gem” according to official ANA criteria, it is not presently associated with an adjectival equivalent. There is also not a consensus description that is associated with this grade. copied from [url]http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=21570[/url] owie pointed to some sites to check side-by-side comparisons, i'll do that within a week, thanks![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
pcgs grading standards in theory and practice ...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...