Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Cherd, post: 24641660, member: 24754&quot;]I guess we have to come up with some extreme standards when trying to distinguish the upper echelons of recent modern coinage. But as an outsider looking in, it seems a bit over the top to implement a whole tier of grading criteria for a feature that requires a microscope to even observe.</p><p><br /></p><p>I don&#039;t know about everybody else, but I do not normally utilize a microscope when enjoying my collection. That being said, since I can&#039;t see it anyway, the tier of grading that I&#039;d have to pay for would amount to nothing more than some designation on the slab (&quot;FS&quot; in this case).</p><p><br /></p><p>I do, however, see the allure in this. When there are so many fantastic looking examples of the thing that you want to collect, then you&#039;ll feel motivated to seek out a feature that separates your collection from the rest. But in cases like this, I feel that I would benefit overall from not getting caught-up in the first place.</p><p><br /></p><p>Matter of personal opinion of course, each to their own.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in