Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
PCGS Gem Proof 3-Piece 1976 Silver Set
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="physics-fan3.14, post: 3183054, member: 19165"]Gem Proof is an old-school term that meant it was a nice coin. Anything considered "Gem" under these descriptive grades would correlate to a modern grade of "65" or higher. </p><p><br /></p><p>The descriptive scale went thusly (and the proof terms correspond): </p><p><br /></p><ul> <li><i>Uncirculated </i>(MS-60, MS-61, MS-62): A technically uncirculated coin with abundant and noticeable defects such as bag marks and scrapes. It is usually accompanied by a poor strike and dull mint luster.</li> <li><i>Select Uncirculated</i> (MS-63): An uncirculated coin with fewer deficiencies and better eye appeal been lower Mint State grades</li> <li><i>Choice Uncirculated</i> (MS-64): These coins have moderate distracting bag marks and/or very few, but noticeable, light scratches due to handling. Eye appeal will be good, but not outstanding.</li> <li><i>Gem Uncirculated</i> (MS-65, MS-66): any uncirculated coin with only minor and light distracting marks or imperfections. Strike and eye appeal will be above average for the coin type.</li> <li><i>Superb Gem Uncirculated</i> (MS-67, MS-68, MS-69): And uncirculated coin with only the slightest of imperfections due to handling and transportation. Many of these imperfections will only be visible under magnification. Strike and eye appeal must be outstanding compared to other coins of the same type.</li> <li><i>Perfect Uncirculated</i> (MS-70): An utterly flawless coin with no imperfections or marks visible even under magnification. Strike must be exceptional and eye appeal must be dazzling.</li> </ul><p>These terms are very important to understand if you read older auction catalogues, and you'll often see them misused by modern shysters to imply something is nicer than it really is. </p><p><br /></p><p>In the case of the OP's coin, I'd suspect that the submitter had a very large quantity of coins that they were submitting. These bulk submissions can designate a minimum grade for numerical grading - anything less than that gets a descriptor, and has reduced grading fees. </p><p><br /></p><p>The signatures are cool, but the set is realistically not worth a whole lot beyond it's "cool" factor.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="physics-fan3.14, post: 3183054, member: 19165"]Gem Proof is an old-school term that meant it was a nice coin. Anything considered "Gem" under these descriptive grades would correlate to a modern grade of "65" or higher. The descriptive scale went thusly (and the proof terms correspond): [LIST] [*][I]Uncirculated [/I](MS-60, MS-61, MS-62): A technically uncirculated coin with abundant and noticeable defects such as bag marks and scrapes. It is usually accompanied by a poor strike and dull mint luster. [*][I]Select Uncirculated[/I] (MS-63): An uncirculated coin with fewer deficiencies and better eye appeal been lower Mint State grades [*][I]Choice Uncirculated[/I] (MS-64): These coins have moderate distracting bag marks and/or very few, but noticeable, light scratches due to handling. Eye appeal will be good, but not outstanding. [*][I]Gem Uncirculated[/I] (MS-65, MS-66): any uncirculated coin with only minor and light distracting marks or imperfections. Strike and eye appeal will be above average for the coin type. [*][I]Superb Gem Uncirculated[/I] (MS-67, MS-68, MS-69): And uncirculated coin with only the slightest of imperfections due to handling and transportation. Many of these imperfections will only be visible under magnification. Strike and eye appeal must be outstanding compared to other coins of the same type. [*][I]Perfect Uncirculated[/I] (MS-70): An utterly flawless coin with no imperfections or marks visible even under magnification. Strike must be exceptional and eye appeal must be dazzling. [/LIST] These terms are very important to understand if you read older auction catalogues, and you'll often see them misused by modern shysters to imply something is nicer than it really is. In the case of the OP's coin, I'd suspect that the submitter had a very large quantity of coins that they were submitting. These bulk submissions can designate a minimum grade for numerical grading - anything less than that gets a descriptor, and has reduced grading fees. The signatures are cool, but the set is realistically not worth a whole lot beyond it's "cool" factor.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
PCGS Gem Proof 3-Piece 1976 Silver Set
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...