Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Owle, post: 3227397, member: 22004&quot;]It looks like Ms. Boyd was responding to members yesterday on her thread on the issue:&nbsp; <a href="https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1008297/lets-talk-about-the-rules/p2" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1008297/lets-talk-about-the-rules/p2" rel="nofollow">https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1008297/lets-talk-about-the-rules/p2</a></p><p><br /></p><p>PCGS has paid out over $1 million in guarantee submissions in the last year which can be a long and arduous process to get them to admit their mistake, no doubt the tight grading, where they don&#039;t net down coins with minor issues is a part consequence of that: </p><p>Last <a href="https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/.warrantydays" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/.warrantydays" rel="nofollow">30 Days</a> | <a href="https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/.warrantymonths" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/.warrantymonths" rel="nofollow">12 Months</a></p><p>NUMBER</p><p>158</p><p>VALUE</p><p>$</p><p>1,008,437</p><p><a href="https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/" rel="nofollow">https://www.pcgs.com/statistics/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Another creepy aspect to PCGS censoring members over the years has been how they will go into members&#039; private messaging not even respecting that fundamental privacy expectation.&nbsp; I have seen a number of members warn about that, and had more than one member talk about going through multiple bannings over trivial issues.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in