Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;EyeEatWheaties, post: 1162881, member: 26972&quot;]Thank you Mike!&nbsp;&nbsp; Well written and well thought out with supporting information/facts. The way posts should be written.&nbsp; To summarize off yours and others posts.</p><p><br /></p><p>I see 5 scenarios on a copper coin submitted for a downgrade review, that ends up also having a color issue:</p><p><br /></p><p>The way the grade guarantee is written, </p><p><br /></p><p><b>1.</b> if the submitted coin goes from 67 to 66 then they have to address the difference in the numerical grade value within the original color category -&nbsp; (the color suffixes were removed for clarity and because they are moot in that they are no longer warrantied)&nbsp; &nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><b>2. </b>It goes into a 67RB and no compensation is given since color is no longer warrantied/guaranteed</p><p><br /></p><p><b>3. </b> PCGS buys the coin to make it disappear.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>4.</b> Coin stays in the holder at customers request or coin still meets grade criteria for the label&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><b>5.</b> They make up some new rule about how since copper color is no longer guaranteed, neither is the numerical grade.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Are there any other scenarios?</b>&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p><b>which is the most likely to happen? </b> </p><p><br /></p><p>And why, for heavens sake, why do they not honor the published values from their price guide?&nbsp;&nbsp; That in itself, makes we wonder how many know that they come up with arbitrary numbers. Numbers that the average collector can&#039;t touch. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Seems to me it would behoove them to give the customer the choice.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in