Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;lordmarcovan, post: 2571431, member: 10461&quot;]I am at home out in the boondocks, which means wretchedly spotty satellite WiFi, so I was not able to load the full sized pictures in the attachments, but I did squint at the thumbnails, and suspected it was a situation like [USER=24314]@Insider[/USER] was describing: an original coin that had a thicker &quot;skin&quot; of toning subduing any luster (or, if I misundertand that definition, &quot;flash&quot;) from the coin&#039;s surfaces.&nbsp; There is certainly nothing wrong with original &quot;skin&quot;, and many discerning collectors seek it.&nbsp; Others prefer a bit more &quot;flashiness&quot;.&nbsp; There are varying degrees and it&#039;s a matter of preference.</p><p><br /></p><p>But from what I could see in the small pictures available to me at this time, the coin looks OK to me.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in