Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Puddin&#039;Farts, post: 3451628, member: 100439&quot;]For the record, no. They wouldn&#039;t ever attribute the multiple DDO&#039;s as FS-101. The same way that they don&#039;t attribute all DDO SMS as FS-901. The Obverse is FS-1__ based on the variety, the Reverse is FS-8__, and the FS-9__ is the same situation for Die Variety. They don&#039;t attribute FS-101 to EVERY DDO of whatever year<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie20" alt=":banghead:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> The same goes for FS-901 for every year you mentioned. It fell into a very specific category of variety for those years. Same goes for the Misplaced MM 57 D Quarter with the designated FS-501. If the D was in a different area of the reverse, with different diagnostics, it would be the FS-502 with more, less, of equal value. It would be an entirely different variety such as the RDV Jefferson Proofs of &#039;38. What are there, 3? So they&#039;re not all clustered into the RDV-401 category..they&#039;re designated as their own number because of variation. If the FS-901 Kennedy was separated this way, it would be a different number as well. However, the die states are the difference, not the dies used to make this coin a particular variety. One of us is having trouble understanding<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie12" alt="o_O" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in