Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Puddin&#039;Farts, post: 3451412, member: 100439&quot;]From PCGS, the FS-901 IS the FS-901... either way. Where from PCGS/NGC or one of the representatives does it state this information? I have found opinions on what classifies a NO FG but when PCGS labels &quot;FS-901-No FG&quot;, it is exactly what it is, correct? An FS-901 is not cross referenced to anything as far as their information. It is simply an FS-901. Same as any FS-101 referring to a specific die as well. An FS-101 1942 D Quarter then...it&#039;s cross referenced to an entirely different Designation to be the specific designation? I would simply appreciate some evidence to back your claim as fact, not opinion. To you, that SP68 &quot;Wolf&quot; is nonsense, yet to PCGS, they HAVE attributed it as the FS-901 No FG. Hmmm...leads me to wonder who is correct? Your opinion or their grading service. Either way, FS-901 is FS-901, as seen on the SP68. It&#039;s not only on ebay, but also the top coin photo on Coinfacts in the NO FG category. So please, enlighten me with evidence from the exact words of PCGS that states anything to back up your statement. Please.[ATTACH=full]917203[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in