Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
PCGS Attribution Service Question
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Puddin'Farts, post: 3429889, member: 100439"]I hadn't even noticed the R in LIBERTY until you mentioned it. Very observant of you. Interestingly, I found a couple things while taking the closer look at this coin. The R does not match up with the SP67, nor the SP66 pictured for quick reference on Coinfacts. However, it does match up to the one they have graded SP68. Also, while looking at the FG area under different lighting, I have found that at a specific angle, there are dots visible where the G was. Also the noticable difference in the diagnostics of the SP68 that is different from the other two. It certainly shows a ghost of what once was there. Now I'm curious if this is either a misattribution or judging by the grade, a sample of one of the earliest No FG's struck from the dies? I have noticed the same dots from the G on at least one SP67 that I have found previous auction data for as well. I know there are two separate No FG designations that both carry the FS-901 from the TPG's for the '66 but haven't been able to find much info aside from buying a Kennedy book. [ATTACH]910715[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]910716[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]910717[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]910718[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Puddin'Farts, post: 3429889, member: 100439"]I hadn't even noticed the R in LIBERTY until you mentioned it. Very observant of you. Interestingly, I found a couple things while taking the closer look at this coin. The R does not match up with the SP67, nor the SP66 pictured for quick reference on Coinfacts. However, it does match up to the one they have graded SP68. Also, while looking at the FG area under different lighting, I have found that at a specific angle, there are dots visible where the G was. Also the noticable difference in the diagnostics of the SP68 that is different from the other two. It certainly shows a ghost of what once was there. Now I'm curious if this is either a misattribution or judging by the grade, a sample of one of the earliest No FG's struck from the dies? I have noticed the same dots from the G on at least one SP67 that I have found previous auction data for as well. I know there are two separate No FG designations that both carry the FS-901 from the TPG's for the '66 but haven't been able to find much info aside from buying a Kennedy book. [ATTACH]910715[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]910716[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]910717[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]910718[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
PCGS Attribution Service Question
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...