Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;JBlade00, post: 1446766, member: 37468&quot;]so, jello was right. The 1889 DOWNGRADED to a 63... I personally don&#039;t get it, it&#039;s the most flawless of all of them, save for the small dig on the reverse. All of the others kept 64. I&#039;m tempted to crack out the 1889 and re-send it in, but it would only benefit me if it goes to 65... same with any other them. The 1902 would be the other candidate. Of course I was hoping the 1892 was coming back MS-65 (it almost increases in value by 5x) but can understand why it didn&#039;t. There is a planchet flaw on the chin of the obverse...</p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;ve looked on Heritage and seen worse coins in 65 AND 66 holders. Hence my hope that at least 1 or 2 would come back 65. I can&#039;t say I&#039;m not a little sad / disappointed at the result to be honest.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for your input![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in