Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Paypal reversal for sellers restocking fee
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Troodon, post: 341778, member: 4626"]OK I don't think we actually disagree here then... I agree with you on the point of reading the fine print and using that in your bidding/purchasing decision. A restocking fee always sends up a red flag for me... if a seller is honest and willing to stand behind their merchandise, they shouldn't need such a protection. An honest seller with quality merchandise should be able to make a reasonable profit even if they ocassionally get stuck with an impossible to please customer who returns the merchandise they just decided they didn't like. As someone who has worked retail for many years (and still does, part-time) I can attest to that.</p><p><br /></p><p>But imagine a situation where you go to an eBay auction page, see a picture of a really nice coin, decide it's a good enough deal to buy... you win it, pay for it... but when the coin shows up, it's nothing at all like it was in the picture. You return it and the seller charges you a restocking fee. Do you just sit back and say "oh well, my fault for assuming I'd actually get what I paid for, and the seller did mention the restocking fee in the auction, so I guess I have to pay it..." or instead do you say "It's not like I just changed my mind here, the seller didn't give me what I paid for, I shouldn't have to pay <i>anything</i>, whether he mentioned a restocking fee or not!" For me it would definitely be the latter, that's the only point I was trying to make. I wouldn't accept the "contract" argument when at best the seller made a mistake he's expecting me to pay for and at worst he comitted fraud. A contract does not provide any legal protection to a seller who does either of those things.</p><p><br /></p><p>I won't comment on the honesty of lawyers... I think that some are honest, some are not, no different than any other profession... but yes a court case is more about who presents a more convincing story than whose side the law is on. However being able to demostrate that the law is clearly on your side holds a lot of weight with juries and/or judges, and a good lawyer wil always be able to do that. The law being on your side is no guarantee of success, but it does tip the odds in your favor.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Troodon, post: 341778, member: 4626"]OK I don't think we actually disagree here then... I agree with you on the point of reading the fine print and using that in your bidding/purchasing decision. A restocking fee always sends up a red flag for me... if a seller is honest and willing to stand behind their merchandise, they shouldn't need such a protection. An honest seller with quality merchandise should be able to make a reasonable profit even if they ocassionally get stuck with an impossible to please customer who returns the merchandise they just decided they didn't like. As someone who has worked retail for many years (and still does, part-time) I can attest to that. But imagine a situation where you go to an eBay auction page, see a picture of a really nice coin, decide it's a good enough deal to buy... you win it, pay for it... but when the coin shows up, it's nothing at all like it was in the picture. You return it and the seller charges you a restocking fee. Do you just sit back and say "oh well, my fault for assuming I'd actually get what I paid for, and the seller did mention the restocking fee in the auction, so I guess I have to pay it..." or instead do you say "It's not like I just changed my mind here, the seller didn't give me what I paid for, I shouldn't have to pay [I]anything[/I], whether he mentioned a restocking fee or not!" For me it would definitely be the latter, that's the only point I was trying to make. I wouldn't accept the "contract" argument when at best the seller made a mistake he's expecting me to pay for and at worst he comitted fraud. A contract does not provide any legal protection to a seller who does either of those things. I won't comment on the honesty of lawyers... I think that some are honest, some are not, no different than any other profession... but yes a court case is more about who presents a more convincing story than whose side the law is on. However being able to demostrate that the law is clearly on your side holds a lot of weight with juries and/or judges, and a good lawyer wil always be able to do that. The law being on your side is no guarantee of success, but it does tip the odds in your favor.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Paypal reversal for sellers restocking fee
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...