Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Parthian flip flop
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 3465543, member: 81887"][USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER] : Bob L. has already given a good description of Assar vs. Sellwood/Shore attributions for your coins, there's not much for me to add there. For Sellwood type 81 (Parthamaspates/Sanatrukes), Assar's reasoning is as follows: Parthamaspates was acknowledged as king only at Ktesiphon (while the Romans were still hanging around) and doesn't seem to have had support in the Iranian highlands, while the anti-Roman rebel and Arsakid prince Sanatrukes was called by John Malalas "emperor of the Persians" and had his power base in Media, which includes Ekbatana where this drachm was minted. However, John Malalas wrote long after the events in question (6th century AD), and is not considered particularly reliable by most historians. Personally, I find Assar's argument fairly plausible, although as Assar himself states "conclusive proof is lacking". Sometimes we just have to live with uncertainty.</p><p><br /></p><p>I do think your characterization of Sellwood and Shore as "worthless" is much too harsh. Yes, further research has questioned some of their attributions, but that is the nature of any active research field- we must be prepared to challenge what we think we know. While there are a number of changed attributions, many others have remained unchanged (most of Mithradates II, Phraates II and III, Orodes II, Phraatakes and many others) and some are just a shift in numbering (the Artabanoses). And the Sellwood numbering system is still an excellent way or organizing Parthian coins, even if the attribution of type X to king Y may have changed since Sellwood wrote (39 years ago for the most recent edition)- I still consider any Parthian coin sold without assignment to the correct Sellwood type to be unattributed. </p><p><br /></p><p>Also, I just checked, and there is a seller on Vcoins selling a used copy of the Sunrise catalogue for just $69. I strongly urge you to buy it now- at that price, it's a steal.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Parthicus, post: 3465543, member: 81887"][USER=19463]@dougsmit[/USER] : Bob L. has already given a good description of Assar vs. Sellwood/Shore attributions for your coins, there's not much for me to add there. For Sellwood type 81 (Parthamaspates/Sanatrukes), Assar's reasoning is as follows: Parthamaspates was acknowledged as king only at Ktesiphon (while the Romans were still hanging around) and doesn't seem to have had support in the Iranian highlands, while the anti-Roman rebel and Arsakid prince Sanatrukes was called by John Malalas "emperor of the Persians" and had his power base in Media, which includes Ekbatana where this drachm was minted. However, John Malalas wrote long after the events in question (6th century AD), and is not considered particularly reliable by most historians. Personally, I find Assar's argument fairly plausible, although as Assar himself states "conclusive proof is lacking". Sometimes we just have to live with uncertainty. I do think your characterization of Sellwood and Shore as "worthless" is much too harsh. Yes, further research has questioned some of their attributions, but that is the nature of any active research field- we must be prepared to challenge what we think we know. While there are a number of changed attributions, many others have remained unchanged (most of Mithradates II, Phraates II and III, Orodes II, Phraatakes and many others) and some are just a shift in numbering (the Artabanoses). And the Sellwood numbering system is still an excellent way or organizing Parthian coins, even if the attribution of type X to king Y may have changed since Sellwood wrote (39 years ago for the most recent edition)- I still consider any Parthian coin sold without assignment to the correct Sellwood type to be unattributed. Also, I just checked, and there is a seller on Vcoins selling a used copy of the Sunrise catalogue for just $69. I strongly urge you to buy it now- at that price, it's a steal.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Parthian flip flop
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...