Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Notaphylic_C, post: 8405256, member: 130786&quot;]-Good question.&nbsp; I think it was the upper numbering tumbler that went awry (with the last 3 digit being high/out of position). I doubt there would have been more than a dozen, perhaps 20 might have passed QC.&nbsp; But when it comes to the numbers of notes that pass inspection, that&#039;s a drop in the bucket (needle in the haystack). The real question is how many were caught? (&amp; in GEM like mine: I doubt many)</p><p><br /></p><p>In 2007 we, in Canada, had a brief run of double-denomination errors (<a href="https://cdnpapermoney.com/index.php?topic=9784.0" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://cdnpapermoney.com/index.php?topic=9784.0" rel="nofollow">$10 notes printed on $20 paper</a>) so many of us searched our <b>BTT</b> &amp; <b>BTU</b> $10 prefixes. Nearly 100 were discovered but I never found one. To find one, you would have had to have searched several bricks (several 1000 <b>BTT</b>&#039;s or <b>BTU</b>&#039;s) &amp; the banks make that nearly impossible to do.&nbsp; Unless you happened to be in the business of money changing (ATM supply) or were a paying brick searcher &amp;1 of the first searchers (ie: the 1st to discover the error). I looked at our SNDB (on <b><a href="https://cdnpapermoney.com/forum/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://cdnpapermoney.com/forum/" rel="nofollow">CPMF</a></b>) &amp; recognize some of the collectors who got lucky. A lot of these things are a matter of great timing (&amp; I never caught such luck in my searches).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in