Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Pantikapaion: question about catalog reference
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 5256292, member: 19463"]Once upon a time, Bing's coin was mine. I got it in 1991 from Frank Robinson who was selling pairs of 'countermarked' coins of this type where one was really countermarked and the other was made with the countermark as part of the design. He had several sets as I recall. At a later date, I upgraded the one with normal c/m's and sold the one from Frank to Bing. At the time, I thought the star/bowcase paired marks were neat and that the ones incorporated in the design were cut into the dies. Today, I would need to see others from the mark incorporated 'dies' that proved it was a die rather than a cast but I don't know anyone else who bought these in 1991 so I have not seen proof one way or the other. Help appreciated.</p><p>My upgrade with paired c/m's:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1219431[/ATTACH] </p><p>The c/m incorporated from 1991:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1219432[/ATTACH] </p><p>This is one of those mysteries I will feel lucky to solve. I need to see another coin with the c/m's in the same place but with different centering. Without that, the coin I have might just be a cast fake (ancient or modern).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 5256292, member: 19463"]Once upon a time, Bing's coin was mine. I got it in 1991 from Frank Robinson who was selling pairs of 'countermarked' coins of this type where one was really countermarked and the other was made with the countermark as part of the design. He had several sets as I recall. At a later date, I upgraded the one with normal c/m's and sold the one from Frank to Bing. At the time, I thought the star/bowcase paired marks were neat and that the ones incorporated in the design were cut into the dies. Today, I would need to see others from the mark incorporated 'dies' that proved it was a die rather than a cast but I don't know anyone else who bought these in 1991 so I have not seen proof one way or the other. Help appreciated. My upgrade with paired c/m's: [ATTACH=full]1219431[/ATTACH] The c/m incorporated from 1991: [ATTACH=full]1219432[/ATTACH] This is one of those mysteries I will feel lucky to solve. I need to see another coin with the c/m's in the same place but with different centering. Without that, the coin I have might just be a cast fake (ancient or modern).[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Pantikapaion: question about catalog reference
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...