Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Leadfoot, post: 1093430, member: 2972&quot;]Thanks for sharing that info (along with the graph a few posts down)!</p><p><br /></p><p>That said, I think that my definition of &quot;weak strike&quot; and Mr. Pope&#039;s are slightly different.&nbsp; When I say weak, I mean anything but full.&nbsp; To use Mr. Pope&#039;s parlance and numbers, I would consider this coin to be in the &quot;good&quot;, &quot;typical&quot; or &quot;weak&quot; strike category, and clearly not in the &quot;full&quot; one.&nbsp; Thus I would put this coin in the 77% of not fully struck coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>More to the point that I was trying to make in the post you originally quoted -- I see nothing wrong with a coin in 66 with the strike weakness exhibited by the coin posted by the OP.&nbsp; Particularly considering that (according to Pope) that more than 3/4 (77%) of the coins show some type of weakness (i.e. less than &quot;full&quot;).</p><p><br /></p><p>Do you disagree?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in