Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KurtS, post: 766860, member: 11786&quot;]I think the &#039;38 is easily explained by machine doubling, seeing how the doubling appears on the ML too. I&#039;m less certain about the &#039;39 because the doubling appears on thinner areas of the 9 where a re-engraving would be particularly helpful. Also interesting how there&#039;s a lack of doubling anywhere else. <i>Not conclusive of course</i>--but this one merits closer scrutiny if there is a documented 1939 RE.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in