Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;The_Cave_Troll, post: 61223, member: 1674&quot;]hmmm, I think it may just be an effect of the photography and lighting because while the coin has really good luster I don&#039;t think it is a proof.&nbsp; On the other hand, the day I was looking through the halves I was able to pick this impaired 62 proof up for melt.&nbsp; It had scotch tape in both of the obverse fields and on the lower portion of the bell on the reverse.&nbsp; Additionally there is a little bit of green verdigris in the letters of &quot;pluribus&quot; on the reverse.&nbsp; It has had an acetone bath or three and the tape and residue is off, but it is obvious that it was there <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie4" alt=":mad:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>1962 Frankie proof obverse:</p><p><img src="http://www.freepichosting.com/Thumbs/421618431/7/600/450.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /> </p><p>reverse:</p><p><img src="http://www.freepichosting.com/Thumbs/421618431/8/600/450.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in