Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Our 1869 S-3
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="SuperDave, post: 2382818, member: 1892"]I dunno; it just seemed obvious to me that a "fresh" area had to have been created after the toning. Then again, not having similar thought processes to me is a compliment to you. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>This is a woodie, which means the darker areas are purer copper than the usual alloy mix and will therefore oxidize even more quickly than a better-mixed planchet. I'd be surprised if this coin wasn't completely toned by 1900, especially in the more polluted atmosphere of that day. Or, within a decade or two of being moved into such an atmosphere, if it spent some of its' life in better rural air. Although all copper needs is oxygen to patinate, like other coinage metals a bit of sulfur in the air won't hurt. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>It's actually worth contemplating some time, how a coin (which by nature won't be stored on edge) can tone so evenly on both faces when one side <b>had</b> to have been against a surface. Unless they <b>all</b> did so in bags, in which case you'd expect more crescent toners from contact with adjacent coins, or terminal-stage toners from the atmosphere being so foul that next-coin contact was overcome. How did this coin come to be?</p><p><br /></p><p>In this case, I think it <b>is</b> terminal-stage album toning, and it's even on both faces (you'd expect the face closer to the album back would tone faster) because it <i>can't</i> tone any further; it's in (gloriously-beautiful) chemical equilibrium. I would further postulate (while I'm wildly speculating) that the slight difference in toning on the high points of the obverse - cheek, chin, feather tips - happened from contact with the closed cover of the album slightly altering the surface characteristics in those areas.</p><p><br /></p><p>And with such irregular edges the fresh area has to be either PMD of some sort or a lamination. The rest of the coin has obviously been well cared for, having no marks notable in your images (I would <b>so</b> own this coin <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> ), so I'm led to conclude it's a detached lamination.</p><p><br /></p><p>Woodies are nice indicators of how alloys aren't always as monolithic as we think.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="SuperDave, post: 2382818, member: 1892"]I dunno; it just seemed obvious to me that a "fresh" area had to have been created after the toning. Then again, not having similar thought processes to me is a compliment to you. :) This is a woodie, which means the darker areas are purer copper than the usual alloy mix and will therefore oxidize even more quickly than a better-mixed planchet. I'd be surprised if this coin wasn't completely toned by 1900, especially in the more polluted atmosphere of that day. Or, within a decade or two of being moved into such an atmosphere, if it spent some of its' life in better rural air. Although all copper needs is oxygen to patinate, like other coinage metals a bit of sulfur in the air won't hurt. :) It's actually worth contemplating some time, how a coin (which by nature won't be stored on edge) can tone so evenly on both faces when one side [B]had[/B] to have been against a surface. Unless they [B]all[/B] did so in bags, in which case you'd expect more crescent toners from contact with adjacent coins, or terminal-stage toners from the atmosphere being so foul that next-coin contact was overcome. How did this coin come to be? In this case, I think it [B]is[/B] terminal-stage album toning, and it's even on both faces (you'd expect the face closer to the album back would tone faster) because it [I]can't[/I] tone any further; it's in (gloriously-beautiful) chemical equilibrium. I would further postulate (while I'm wildly speculating) that the slight difference in toning on the high points of the obverse - cheek, chin, feather tips - happened from contact with the closed cover of the album slightly altering the surface characteristics in those areas. And with such irregular edges the fresh area has to be either PMD of some sort or a lamination. The rest of the coin has obviously been well cared for, having no marks notable in your images (I would [B]so[/B] own this coin :) ), so I'm led to conclude it's a detached lamination. Woodies are nice indicators of how alloys aren't always as monolithic as we think.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Error Coins
>
Our 1869 S-3
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...